Senator Joe Biden, the Democratic Vice-Presidential nominee known for fighting for the middle-class, is facing increased scrutiny for his support of the Bankruptcy bill signed into law in 2005 – scrutiny that stems from work his son did for one of the major companies supporting the bill.
On August 24, 2008, the New York Times published an article entitled, “Obama Aides Defend Bank’s Pay to Biden’s Son.” The article states that a five-year consulting agreement between Hunter Biden and MNBA, a large financial services company, has raised questions about Senator Biden’s objectivity in voting to pass the Bankruptcy bill.
Although no lobbying was done by Hunter Biden on behalf of MNBA, it does not do a great service to Senator Biden’s image as a protector of the middle-class to have his son getting paid six-figures by one of the major companies lobbying in support of the Bankruptcy bill Senator Biden helped pass.
Methinks both sides are protesting too much – I doubt very much that Senator Biden is either in the pocket of MNBA or that he was completely unbiased in his support of the bankruptcy bill. Imagine a Senator from Delaware, a state that makes incorporating more enticing to companies than just about any other, supporting a bill helpful to a Delaware corporation – shocking!
The question is, was Senator Biden biased because he wanted to support a bill that would help Delaware companies, and hence, the Delaware economy, or was the bias more personal – was there some kind of unspoken “quid pro quo” with MNBA? I see no evidence in Senator Biden’s career to suggest the latter, and think it would be strange indeed if he did not work on behalf of companies from the state he was elected to represent. Of course, the bill affects not only companies, but citizens; but citizens are also employees, and companies supporting the bill employ a large number of Delaware citizens, which makes it even more difficult to speculate as to whether any bias Senator Biden had was proper or not. Perhaps in some cases, a man with a track record of honesty and “fighting for the little guy” should be given the benefit of the doubt, no?
Read the NY times article: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/25/us/politics/25biden.html